Comparison
WP Minerals and BioMin II
WP Minerals (Kirkman) lists 13 distinct ingredients and BioMin II (Thorne Research) 11 (rows of one ingredient counted once); 11 are on both labels. On the site's similarity measure, which compares ingredient lists (1 for the same list, rarer ingredients counting for more; amounts are not part of it), the two formulas score 0.79.
| Ingredient | WP Minerals | BioMin II |
|---|---|---|
| Calcium | 100 mg (8%) | 300 mg (23%) |
| Magnesium | 20 mg (5%) | 270 mg (64%) |
| Zinc | 25 mg (227%) | 21 mg (191%) |
| Potassium | 20 mg (under 1%) | 90 mg (2%) |
| Chromium | 200 mcg (571%) | 200 mcg (571%) |
| Selenium | 100 mcg (182%) | 150 mcg (273%) |
| Manganese | 5 mg (217%) | 6 mg (261%) |
| Iodine | 100 mcg (67%) | 120 mcg (80%) |
| Molybdenum | 50 mcg (111%) | 90 mcg (200%) |
| Boron | 0.04 mg | 3 mg |
| Vanadium | 50 mcg | 90 mcg |
| Vitamin C | 71 mg (79%) | |
| Lithium | 0.25 mg |
Amounts are per serving as DSLD gives them: WP Minerals, 1 capsule; BioMin II, 3 capsules. Current labels entered October 2023 and November 2012. Percentages of the Daily Value from 21 CFR 101.9. Source: NIH ODS Dietary Supplement Label Database.
Each product on its own
- WP MineralsKirkman: every row against all products listing it
- BioMin IIThorne Research: every row against all products listing it