Comparison
Optimum Zinc and Zinc Sulfate 220 mg
Optimum Zinc (CoDeCo Nutrilife) lists 2 distinct ingredients and Zinc Sulfate 220 mg (Rugby) 2 (rows of one ingredient counted once); 2 are on both labels. On the site's similarity measure, which compares ingredient lists (1 for the same list, rarer ingredients counting for more; amounts are not part of it), the two formulas score 1.00: the same ingredients, at the amounts in the table below.
| Ingredient | Optimum Zinc | Zinc Sulfate 220 mg |
|---|---|---|
| Calcium | 70 mg (5%) | 95 mg (7%) |
| Zinc | 50 mg (455%) | 50 mg (455%) |
Amounts are per serving as DSLD gives them: Optimum Zinc, 1 tablet; Zinc Sulfate 220 mg, 1 tablet. Current labels entered January 2012 and April 2019. Percentages of the Daily Value from 21 CFR 101.9. Source: NIH ODS Dietary Supplement Label Database.
Each product on its own
- Optimum ZincCoDeCo Nutrilife: every row against all products listing it
- Zinc Sulfate 220 mgRugby: every row against all products listing it