Supplement brand
Bezwecken
Bezwecken has 4 supplement product labels cataloged in the NIH DSLD, 4 currently on market, #1,841 of 4,269 by catalog size.
- 4
- Total products
- 4
- On market
- #1,841 of 4,269
- By catalog size
- 100%
- Still on market
Brand at a glance
According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Dietary Supplements' September 2026 Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD) release, Bezwecken filed 4 supplement labels; 100% still on-market, ranking #1,841 of 4,269 by catalog size among brands PlainVitamins indexes.
- 4
- Total DSLD labels
- 4
- On market today
- 100%
- Still listed
- #1,841 of 4,269
- Catalog rank
Figures come from NIH DSLD label rows PlainVitamins indexes. Catalog size is a filing count, not a quality, safety, or efficacy score.
Bezwecken vs all brands by DSLD catalog size
Where this brand's product-label count sits among every brand PlainVitamins indexes (archive depth, not a quality or safety ranking)
4 2057th of 4271 higher than 2,214 of 4,271 brands
Brands banded by distinct NIH DSLD product labels
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more brands. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD) · 2026-09-04
Bezwecken labels by product type
Distinct DSLD product-type counts for this brand's catalog (second framed viz alongside the brand-vs-all distribution)
- Botanical
Botanical
3 labels
- Other Combinations 1
Other Combinations
1 labels
Bezwecken's formulation profile
28.1% of the 32 ingredient entries across Bezwecken's catalog are ingredients outside DSLD's named categories, followed by complex-carbohydrate ingredients (18.8%). 9 distinct DSLD ingredient categories are represented overall. DSLD's own ingredient categories are a filing classification, not a quality, safety, or efficacy assessment.
Bezwecken ingredients by DSLD category
Distinct ingredient-category counts across every DSLD label on file for this brand
- Other
Other
9 ingredient rows
- Complex carbohydrate
Complex carbohydrate
6 ingredient rows
- Sugar
Sugar
4 ingredient rows
- Enzyme
Enzyme
4 ingredient rows
- Blend
Blend
4 ingredient rows
- Botanical 2
Botanical
2 ingredient rows
- Vitamin 1
Vitamin
1 ingredient rows
- Non-nutrient 1
Non-nutrient
1 ingredient rows
Bezwecken against its closest catalog-size peers
This chart compares Bezwecken against its 5 nearest DSLD peers by total filed labels, plotting catalog scale on one axis and on-market survival on the other -- two brands with near-identical catalog sizes can land in opposite quadrants. Bezwecken itself is mostly built from ingredients outside DSLD's named categories.
Reading Bezwecken's DSLD catalog record
Bezwecken places in the 52nd percentile of brands by distinct product-label count (rank #2,057 of 4,271). Catalog size and on-market share are volume metrics from NIH DSLD filings, not quality, safety, or efficacy scores.
Products by Bezwecken
No products found for this brand.
Shelf peers by catalog size
NIH DSLD brands whose filing counts sit nearest to Bezwecken's 4-label shelf (not the estate's largest catalogs), drawn from an estate where Bezwecken itself leans toward ingredients outside DSLD's named categories. On-market % is shelf status, not a quality score.
Compare Bezwecken vs 1Shot Protein → (Δ same count)
Source: NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD). Regulatory framework: Source: Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), 1994, 21 U.S.C. § 321(ff).
Disclaimer, Not Medical Advice: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before starting, stopping, or combining any dietary supplement.
Read our methodology , how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainVitamins is rendered directly from the NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD), no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on the NIH DSLD, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.